Today's hottest deals

ECS H67H2-M2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H67H2-M2  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 20:55
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 165
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 160
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 3171) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walram 128G 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2011052P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 108 103 101 102 98 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.9% Average
Read 243
Write 173
Mixed 185
SusWrite 112
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 10.5
67% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 18.8
46% 94.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
202GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 101 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 100
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 102
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-035.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67H2-M2 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H67H2-M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $24
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback