Today's hottest deals

Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150317
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateAug 27 '17 at 08:51
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 153
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 568
52% 435 Pts
64-Core 1,845
114% 1,845 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
EVGA(3842 1996) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.2% Above average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 102
Parallax 83.7
48% 81.6 fps
MRender 87.3
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 90.5
67% 80.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 87%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 506
Write 409
Mixed 213
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 27.6
110% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 65.8
72% 123 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-007.D01G 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 10
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.1
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 286 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback