Notebook W65_W670SR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNotebook W65_W670SR  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_W670SR
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130620
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 19 '21 at 13:07
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 169
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 415
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
Clevo(1558 0650) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
7.85% Terrible
Lighting 9.1
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 10.7
7% 10.1 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 10.2
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.85%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 mSATA 120GB-$398
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 56 56 53 53 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 390
Write 134
Mixed 188
SusWrite 62.5
42% 194 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 29.7
112% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 122
105% 160 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 73%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
123GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 58 58 60 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 59.6
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 58.7
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG 99U5469-041.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_W670SR Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_W670SR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback