Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 01:18
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 69.2
1-Core 113
2-Core 209
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 476
64% 475 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.11.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 22
13% 17.7 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 17
Splatting 14.1
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 392 392 375 411 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 354
Write 28.6
Mixed 276
SusWrite 389
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 13.5
108% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 16.9
74% 162 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX426C16FB/16 32GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 32.7
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 25.4
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback