Asus Z170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '21 at 11:15
Run Duration280 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$228
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 96.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 279
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 770
73% 606 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 197
Parallax 196
156% 195 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 198
Splatting 129
126% 156 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 137%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX8200PNP 1TB
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R090 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1593 1505 1755 1781 1783 1791 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,450
Write 1,916
Mixed 1,323
SusWrite 1,701
413% 1,848 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 249
4K Mixed 104
361% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 1,336
DQ Mixed 512
542% 875 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 361%
Great: 355%
Nvme WDS100T3XHC-00SJ 1TB
630GB free
Firmware: 1020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1747 1521 1520 1507 1805 1502 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 1,321
Write 1,030
Mixed 1,053
SusWrite 1,600
282% 1,251 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 83.4
304% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 903
DQ Write 1,471
DQ Mixed 1,164
889% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 297%
Great: 317%
WD Purple Surveillance 8TB (2017)-$215
7TB free
Firmware: 80.H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 169 173 177 173 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 152
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 168
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 100%
WD Re 3TB (2012)-$55
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 157 157 157 158 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 148
Write 144
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 157
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 96%
WDC WD40 00FYYZ-01UL1B1 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 145 145 146 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62% Good
Read 147
Write 147
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 145
172% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
WDC WD40 00FYYZ-01UL1B3 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 149 149 148 151 150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65.2% Good
Read 162
Write 156
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 146
180% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
150% 1.77 MB/s
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 18.8
96% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00RWYB1 6TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 18 19 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 149
Write 148
Mixed 76
SusWrite 19.9
123% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK32GX4M4B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 33.6
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 32.2
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 51.1
78% 51.1 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus Z170M-PLUS - $87

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback