Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2234 68 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 73.5 1-Core 137 2-Core 248 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 443 8-Core 694 70% 569 Pts	64-Core 662 41% 662 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000 8,041 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Lighting 29.6 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 26.4 24% 28.2 fps	MRender 24.7 Gravity 27.2 Splatting 24.1 21% 25.3 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 25%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB 6,582 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.9% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 12.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E-2234IntelBench 87%, 68 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 24%, 8,041 samples	2x

SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512G-1001 512GBWDCBench 214%, 9,336 samples	2x

RAM
M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,582 samples	2x