Acer Aspire V3-372

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V3-372  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire V3-372
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 05:03
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 86%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 102
52% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 134
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 135
8% 135 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Acer(1025 104C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 9.5
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 284 280 284 288 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 292
Mixed 244
SusWrite 283
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 33.9
132% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 244
208% 306 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.5% Very good
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 18
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-372 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-372

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback