Today's hottest deals

Zoostorm A_M_I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemZoostorm A_M_I  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-DS2V
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime8 Days
Run DateNov 23 '21 at 20:02
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 182
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 349
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 347
22% 347 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (43 fps cap detected)
33.3% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 44.6
35% 43.5 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 28.5
29% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 244
Write 218
Mixed 21.6
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 0.7
22% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 33.3
33% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$23
760GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 194 198 201 201 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 127
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 195
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron DVM64453C DATARAM 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Zoostorm A_M_I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback