Today's hottest deals

Sony VPCEB3M1R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSony VPCEB3M1R  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100720
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '21 at 21:47
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 99.3
46% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 148
20% 146 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 44 44 47 51 74 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 146
Write 65.9
Mixed 104
SusWrite 49.8
20% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 15.1
49% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 97.2
DQ Write 62.2
DQ Mixed 60
50% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$15
72GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 30 16 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 44
Write 27.1
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 11.2
22% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16%
Great: 41%
Storejet Transcend 1TB
65GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 15 15 15 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 22.8
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 14.9
16% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 65%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 5.2 4.7 4.8 6 7.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 5.2
11% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
23.7% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.4
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VPCEB3M1R Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Sony VPCEB3M1R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback