Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z370M AORUS Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 26 '21 at 01:14
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 82.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 670
75% 590 Pts
64-Core 725
45% 725 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 61.3
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 67.6
50% 66.1 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 62.8
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 11 41 3 16 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.9% Above average
Read 205
Write 99.2
Mixed 266
SusWrite 39.3
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 25.3
111% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 16.7
55% 122 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
88GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 102 102 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 78.5
Write 77.3
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 101
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 8A45 CL16-20-20 D4-3200 KHX2400C15/8G 8A45 CL16-20-20 D4-3200 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.1% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 25
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 21.6
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370M AORUS Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $337
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback