LG 23V545-G.BK51P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLG 23V545-G.BK51P1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG White Tip Mountain
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140425
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 27 '21 at 03:51
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 166
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 232
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1854 0195) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 6.4
3% 6.2 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MZMPC032HBCD-00000 32GB
29GB free
Firmware: CXM1201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 369
Write 32.3
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 31.7
26% 123 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 3.8
27% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 45%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX005L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 78.5
Write 16.8
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 15.7
24% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 0114 SH564128FH8NZPHSCG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23V545-G.BK51P1 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: LG 23V545-G.BK51P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback