Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5095 1,699 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Memory 18.9 1-Core 33.2 2-Core 47.4 19% 33.2 Pts	4-Core 62.2 8-Core 68.9 9% 65.6 Pts	64-Core 89.2 6% 89.2 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8836 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.47 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qunion 512GB 512GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 397GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0503A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 211 282 294 307 293 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 362 Write 296 Mixed 297 SusWrite 281 70% 309 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 10.1 40% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 95.8 DQ Mixed 42.8 50% 87.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 12GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 6.1 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.8 14% 4.73 GB/s	Latency 329 12% 329 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	21x
Celeron N5095AIntelBench 40%, 431 samples	1x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	22x

RAM
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x6GBMicronBench 48%, 69 samples	16x
53D512M64D4RQ-046 1x8GBMicronBench 37%, 39 samples	3x
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x8GBMicronBench 39%, 25 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16