Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0NW73C
Memory18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 04:03
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 63.5
2-Core 127
51% 86 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 379
39% 317 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
MSI(1462 2825) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 55
35% 45.8 fps
MRender 56
Gravity 52
Splatting 40.8
40% 49.6 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 500GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 389
Write 459
Mixed 426
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 41.4
146% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 212
169% 230 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 135%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
14GB free, PID ab31
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 23.8
Write 21.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 19.4
29% 21.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
168% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 78%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
2GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 14.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 16.9
24% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 59%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
61GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 11 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 23.8
Mixed 26
SusWrite 16.2
32% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
75% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 71%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
282GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 1.1 1.1 1.7 2.2 2.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 25
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 1.4
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 48%
WDC WD10 0EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
190GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 7.8 1.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 25.8
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 3.5
27% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
156% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 01BA 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 01BA 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback