Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 19:34
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 148
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 432
42% 346 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Device(4D50 4449) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
169% Outstanding
Lighting 217
Reflection 332
Parallax 262
177% 270 fps
MRender 341
Gravity 250
Splatting 188
204% 260 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 169%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
584GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 333 349 358 402 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 420
Mixed 399
SusWrite 344
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 48.7
154% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 202
157% 218 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 133%
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193
133GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 139 129 136 136 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 125
Write 202
Mixed 162
SusWrite 131
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 26
105% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 133
115% 169 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 91%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
98GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 159 185 186 192 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67% Good
Read 348
Write 286
Mixed 291
SusWrite 177
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 26.4
111% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 48.4
77% 146 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67%
Great: 86%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
110GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 286 66 72 65 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 467
Write 390
Mixed 387
SusWrite 139
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 27.8
123% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 46.2
89% 178 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 86%
DAS TerraMaster 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 107 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 107
Write 102
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 104
66% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
852GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 155 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 144
Mixed 100
SusWrite 155
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 109%
DAS TerraMaster 2TB
460GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 101
Mixed 71.1
66% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 127%
DAS TerraMaster 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 104
Mixed 48.2
57% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 19
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 16
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 900 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback