Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '21 at 03:10
Run Duration364 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 177
2-Core 356
112% 209 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1,240
116% 964 Pts
64-Core 2,806
174% 2,806 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.8% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 59.6
49% 59.7 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 59.5
Splatting 59.8
49% 59.6 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4130012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 139 175 114 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 496
Write 263
Mixed 190
SusWrite 149
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 28.4
128% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 193
146% 196 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 90%
ST12000NM001G-2MV103 12TB
15GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 210 200 202 207 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 204
Write 181
Mixed 118
SusWrite 206
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1.3
59% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 13.5
DQ Mixed 2.4
4% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 44%
Pcie SSD 2TB
183GB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1207 1095 1005 1089 1068 1074 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 1,619
Write 2,425
Mixed 1,721
SusWrite 1,090
388% 1,714 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 79.6
272% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,679
DQ Write 1,377
DQ Mixed 1,465
1,114% 1,507 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 283%
Great: 326%
Seagate Expansion HDD 12TB
21GB free
Firmware: 1801
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 114 115 117 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 102
Write 99.9
Mixed 117
SusWrite 111
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 1.3
37% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2.2
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 2.2
4% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 40%
Pcie SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1130 949 1023 1085 1097 1111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 1,553
Write 2,130
Mixed 1,716
SusWrite 1,066
365% 1,616 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 79.1
272% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,523
DQ Write 1,227
DQ Mixed 1,342
1,014% 1,364 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 273%
Great: 326%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
11GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 171 177 178 178 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 120
Mixed 82
SusWrite 175
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$105
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 79.2
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 34.8
149% 52.2 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 36.8
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 137%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $276

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback