Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4160T 2,374 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 171 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 240 32% 239 Pts	64-Core 238 15% 238 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Geonix 120GB 128GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: T112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 291 291 291 288 291 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 429 Write 284 Mixed 288 SusWrite 290 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 19.5 124% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 61.6 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 37.7 68% 127 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 78%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 179GB free Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 89.6 Write 90.1 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 80 59% 80.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 8GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.6% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 8.7 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	3,555x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	714x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	684x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	254x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	182x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	174x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16