Lenovo 90Q8004DGE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90Q8004DGE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3715
Memory49.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201120
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 20:42
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.2
1-Core 146
2-Core 300
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,026
97% 807 Pts
64-Core 1,492
92% 1,492 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
MSI(1462 3890) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 260
Reflection 237
Parallax 288
212% 262 fps
MRender 300
Gravity 221
Splatting 163
179% 228 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 181%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1290 945 920 921 858 808 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,522
Write 1,795
Mixed 1,419
SusWrite 957
321% 1,423 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 60.3
191% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 955
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 826
621% 834 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 216%
Great: 380%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$122
1.5TB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1492 1544 1613 1437 1209 1232 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 879
Write 1,528
Mixed 1,040
SusWrite 1,421
277% 1,217 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 45.4
160% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 759
DQ Mixed 892
670% 902 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 212%
Great: 307%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
127GB free
Firmware: JA0OA710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 59 60 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 68.3
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 58.5
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 57%
SMI USB DISK 252GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 11 10 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 12.2
Write 26.7
Mixed 2
SusWrite 23.6
23% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.3
154% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 Tigo LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A 029E CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 Tigo LMKUFG68AHFHD-32A 64GB
2667, 3200, 2667, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 25.4
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 24.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90Q8004DGE Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90Q8004DGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback