Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive368% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory123.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 09:25
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 63.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 295
88% 169 Pts
4-Core 522
8-Core 1,142
97% 832 Pts
64-Core 5,792
358% 5,792 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.5% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 137
Parallax 123
95% 125 fps
MRender 170
Gravity 106
Splatting 118
106% 131 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2505 2511 2495 1493 1468 1477 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,652
Write 2,511
Mixed 1,950
SusWrite 1,992
512% 2,276 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 90.9
300% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,211
DQ Write 917
DQ Mixed 1,034
781% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 368%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3000C16 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
79.7% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 29.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 27.7
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback