Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-MA78LM-S2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA78LM-S2  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 23:11
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 46.5
2-Core 95.4
46% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 240
26% 206 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 128GB 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 98 110 119 103 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 297
Write 126
Mixed 152
SusWrite 116
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 29.2
103% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 124
100% 141 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
40GB free
Firmware: 58.01D58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 71 68 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 69.6
Write 64.6
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 69
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 59%
Kingston DT 101 G2 8GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 1.7 2.4 2.9 2.8 2.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 9.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.7
8% 7.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.9
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA78LM-S2 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78LM-S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $26
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback