Insys WHA-14P2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemInsys WHA-14P2  (all builds)
MotherboardINSYS WHA-14P2
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateDec 05 '21 at 21:35
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 83.7
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 124
56% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 167
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Device(1E50 8002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 5.9
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 4.4
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 2280 SATA SSD 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEA2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 130 92 68 109 150 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.3% Poor
Read 148
Write 62.2
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 105
21% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 11.4
54% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 19.1
DQ Write 21.9
DQ Mixed 19.7
15% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LS34G6K53FP-1611CL 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WHA-14P2 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Insys WHA-14P2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback