Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180920
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '21 at 23:25
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 440
58% 434 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
PNY(196E 1329) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.84
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.7% Very good
Lighting 97.4
Reflection 97.5
Parallax 88.7
79% 94.5 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 78.3
72% 88.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900J13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 361 446 417 247 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 454
Mixed 382
SusWrite 318
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 41.8
153% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 195
172% 253 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 91%
Team TM8PS7256G 256GB
181GB free
Firmware: U0115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 353 433 417 447 435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 436
Mixed 404
SusWrite 394
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 22.9
134% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 33
91% 189 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 95%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDE721064SLA360 640GB
232GB free
Firmware: ST0BA36A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 86 86 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 81.8
Write 81.2
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 85.5
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 61%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 104 104 105 107 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 121
Write 111
Mixed 62
SusWrite 103
73% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 83%
StoreJet Transcend 750GB
284GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 38 40 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 25.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 38.2
40% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 89F2 GR26C16S8K2HU416 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 26.6
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.7
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback