Today's hottest deals

Alienware 17 R5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware 17 R5  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware 17 R5
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 07:08
Run Duration684 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 263
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 786
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 0888) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.35
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 99
Reflection 128
Parallax 96.3
81% 108 fps
Gravity 101
Splatting 107
92% 104 fps
Poor: 48% Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA75D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 1298 1222 1176 1138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 2,055
Write 1,242
Mixed 556
SusWrite 806
257% 1,165 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 51.9
168% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 947
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 548
436% 625 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 213%
Great: 331%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
179GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 89 93 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 48.6
Write 81.4
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 63
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 95%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 158 169 169 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 125
Write 144
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 110
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
186% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 92%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$9
15GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 2.8 59 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 88.7
Write 41.5
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 15.8
58% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.2
147% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 26.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 27.5
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17 R5 Builds (Compare 594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Alienware 17 R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback