Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite L775 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Oneonta Falls
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '21 at 12:27
Run Duration	534 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 42 2-Core 92.5 43% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 139 18% 136 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 1TB 1TB 1,116 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 907GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0701A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 356 350 352 352 355 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 418 Write 370 Mixed 348 SusWrite 355 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 65 4K Mixed 18.3 86% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 165 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 41.7 80% 156 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 104%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 25GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 19.6 Write 11.9 SusWrite 10.6 16% 14 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.1 50% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SAMSUNG-4G1600HS 2x4GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45.8% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.9 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	38x
HD Graphics 4000IntelBench 2%, 128 samples	7x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	5x

RAM
EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,533 samples	7x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	5x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16