Cyberpowerpc TRACER III

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemCyberpowerpc TRACER III  (all builds)
MotherboardCyberpowerPC TRACER III
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 16:49
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 228
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 676
69% 555 Pts
64-Core 838
52% 838 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 1045) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1069
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 7.3
5% 28.4 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 155 50 44 46 46 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 628
Write 169
Mixed 287
SusWrite 97.6
65% 296 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 3
94% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 280%
Samsung 970 EVO 250GB
442GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1554 1127 807 673 672 660 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 594
Write 959
Mixed 567
SusWrite 916
172% 759 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 75.4
247% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1144
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 976
742% 1,005 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 202%
Great: 332%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 78 79 72 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 32
Write 39.3
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 76.5
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX16GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMSX32GX4M2A2400C16 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.6
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TRACER III Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Cyberpowerpc TRACER III

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback