Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 168 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 511 52% 420 Pts	64-Core 513 32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 90 21 42 35 32 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.5% Average	Read 135 Write 85.4 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 42.4 19% 85.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 29.1 89% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 33.2 53% 105 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 100%
ST6000AS0002-1N917X 6TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 6.5TB free Firmware: AR13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 94 56 51 16 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	8.57% Terrible	Read 62.1 Write 109 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 61.2 17% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 0.8 8% 4.37 MB/s	DQ Read 1.3 DQ Write 3 DQ Mixed 2.8 2% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.57% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 3x8GB 228 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	17x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $606

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16