Acer Veriton M68WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M68WS  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M68WS
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 14:52
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 163
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 376
41% 324 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170
Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 11
11% 13.5 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 13.2
Splatting 14.4
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SATAIII 240GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0222A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 64 60 76 36 35 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.7% Average
Read 231
Write 215
Mixed 222
SusWrite 75.9
42% 186 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 16.5
71% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 41.1
71% 139 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
261GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 96 96 97 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 95.9
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 95.9
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
297GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 104 104 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 104
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5402-461.A00LF 0198 99U5471-050.A00LF 0198 99U5402-461.A00LF 0198 99U5471-050.A00LF 24GB
1334, 1600, 1334, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 11.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M68WS Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M68WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback