Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/2.5G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/2.5G  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '22 at 04:39
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$283
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 158
2-Core 301
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 630
8-Core 1,116
105% 873 Pts
64-Core 2,053
127% 2,053 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 107%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Lighting 94.5
Reflection 90.3
Parallax 77.8
77% 87.5 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 73.1
60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1883 1903 1903 1920 1919 1907 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 881
Write 1,920
Mixed 1,207
SusWrite 1,906
338% 1,478 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 67.2
223% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,281
DQ Write 949
DQ Mixed 1,091
822% 1,107 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 270%
Great: 421%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$34
369GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 161 161 161 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 146
Write 145
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 160
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 113%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 88 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 71.9
Write 68.7
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 87.3
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
298GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 106 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 95.7
Write 101
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 106
67% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 29.7
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 31.5
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/2.5G Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z490 Phantom Gaming 4/2.5G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback