Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics200% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 16:08
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700K-$230
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 176
2-Core 305
107% 193 Pts
4-Core 675
8-Core 1,196
113% 936 Pts
64-Core 1,666
103% 1,666 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
ASRock(1849 5213) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
200% Outstanding
Lighting 262
Reflection 255
Parallax 501
214% 339 fps
MRender 399
Gravity 217
Splatting 294
246% 303 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 200%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,031
Write 2,069
Mixed 1,674
499% 2,258 MB/s
4K Read 86.7
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 123
412% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 1,798
DQ Write 1,380
DQ Mixed 1,567
1,178% 1,582 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 377%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 13 12 11 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 91.8
Write 11.7
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 12.5
33% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 38.9
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 28
SC Write 45.5
SC Mixed 36.8
105% 36.8 GB/s
Latency 51.4
78% 51.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 11,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $740
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback