Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive434% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8704
Memory52.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 11:04
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$123
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 768
74% 608 Pts
64-Core 993
62% 993 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.4% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 103
Parallax 106
93% 108 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 96.6
Splatting 89
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 47 47 46 47 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
434% Outstanding
Read 4,714
Write 51
Mixed 102
SusWrite 46.6
256% 1,228 MB/s
4K Read 598
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 6.3
916% 203 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 434%
Great: 317%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
225GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 166 166 163 165 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 167
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 164
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
62GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 158
Write 130
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 93.5
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
1TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 36
Mixed 31
SusWrite 35.3
46% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 47%
ST2000VX 000-1CU164 2TB
1TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 36
Write 37.8
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 4.4
35% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.4
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 21
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,880 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback