Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme4-M  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 18:48
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 131
54% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 199
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3718) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 66.7
56% 69.2 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 65.5
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM960HAHP-0Z005 960GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXM1003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 372 392 390 388 400 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 429
Write 387
Mixed 368
SusWrite 370
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 39.7
135% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 257
193% 258 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 184 188 188 188 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 185
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 185
104% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/8GX Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 12.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme4-M Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $160
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback