Lenovo 06064F1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 06064F1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 19:06
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 151
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 426
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Elitegroup(1019 1026) 1GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 16.7
15% 17.2 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 15.1
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 225 227 222 224 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.3% Good
Read 246
Write 186
Mixed 220
SusWrite 224
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 30.1
100% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 173
136% 188 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 118%
CHIPSBNK v3.5.0.8 4GB
2GB free, PID 2095
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.2 2.9 2.6 2.6 2.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 0.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.3
5% 5.65 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351V7BFR8C 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 31.5
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.7
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 06064F1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 06064F1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback