Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory23.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime42.3 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 22:09
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$124
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 158
2-Core 275
91% 168 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 735
78% 620 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
EVGA(3842 2754) 2GB
CLim: 1489 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 18.2
16% 19 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 17.5
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 44 62 61 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 97.4
Write 96
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 51.2
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $694
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback