Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 21:43
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 136
55% 93 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 222
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1503 MHz, MLim: 1952 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.6
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 23.2
14% 24.2 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 17.3
Splatting 30
22% 25.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
478GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 81 78 81 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 389
Write 84.1
Mixed 120
SusWrite 80.6
37% 168 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 23.4
98% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 103
86% 128 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 121%
Team T25 3A3001T 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: U011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 355 360 361 367 365 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 423
Write 371
Mixed 346
SusWrite 360
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 18.7
110% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 33.7
61% 118 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.3% Below average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.8
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback