HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Desktop M01-F1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87D6
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 03:07
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 41.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 210
65% 124 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 628
60% 495 Pts
64-Core 688
42% 688 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
PNY(196E 11C8) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 14.8
13% 13.6 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 15.9
11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX013N 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1003 903 411 401 388 394 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 948
Write 733
Mixed 833
SusWrite 583
174% 774 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 39.7
141% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 684
490% 645 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 145%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U2S1ME-8 8GBF1X08LFHH35-12-K 16GB
3200, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 21.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 13
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop M01-F1xxx Builds (Compare 1,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop M01-F1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $90
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback