Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 81.4 1-Core 122 2-Core 245 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 667 73% 578 Pts	64-Core 681 42% 681 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.7% Poor	Lighting 37.7 Reflection 41.3 Parallax 38.6 31% 39.2 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 27.6 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Se 3TB (2013)-$145 926 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 3TB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 87 86 81 97 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 87.7 Write 102 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 83.9 60% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 2x8GB 23,800 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.7% Good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 20.5 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 22.4 SC Mixed 18.9 54% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 94%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	358x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	217x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	208x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	144x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $88Bench 212%, 171,271 samples	109x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	104x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $69Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	201x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	169x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $38Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	127x

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $377