Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 0 77 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket-B2 1356, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 73.2 1-Core 66.5 2-Core 159 57% 99.4 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 585 53% 447 Pts	64-Core 1,463 90% 1,463 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 833F) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.93 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 552GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 430 394 390 395 392 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 394 Write 395 Mixed 372 SusWrite 406 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 41.7 4K Mixed 27.8 96% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 338 256% 345 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1819 1646 1697 1598 1583 1431 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 1,906 Write 1,572 Mixed 1,461 SusWrite 1629 369% 1,642 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 48.8 148% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 531 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 426 319% 430 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 435%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4C-P 6x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 6 of 6 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	67.1% Good	MC Read 23.4 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 30 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 6.1 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2450 01stBench 58%, 75 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2470 01stBench 63%, 77 samples	1x
Xeon E5-2407 0IntelBench 54%, 184 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples	2x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
Radeon HD 3800ATIBench 5%, 3,400 samples	1x

SSD
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 512GBSpccBench 71%, 30,264 samples	2x
SSD2SC120GE2DA08B-T 120GBPNYBench 65%, 109 samples	1x

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C-H 6x4GBHynixBench 41%, 3 samples	2x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S 6x8GBCrucialBench 67%, 5 samples	2x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-P 6x8GBHynixBench 79%, 2 samples	1x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16