PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | ECS H81H3-A3 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140630 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 19 '21 at 13:21 |
Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
Run User | VNM-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Pentium G3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
34.6%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$46
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 58.01D58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 39 38 39 38 42 MB/s
|
21.8%
Poor
|
|||
WD WD5000AVCS-6 500GB
429GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 81 83 84 85 MB/s
|
48%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix DMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Kingston 9905471-021.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
49.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 4x |
Xeon E3-1231 v3Intel $209Bench 73%, 19,313 samples | 3x |
Xeon E3-1220 v3Intel $104Bench 69%, 5,273 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 4x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 37% - Below average | Total price: $409 |