Gigabyte GA-X170-Extreme ECC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X170-Extreme ECC  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '17 at 10:13
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 252
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 500
67% 500 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 43.6
27% 36.2 fps
MRender 41.6
Gravity 40
Splatting 34.3
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM03B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 499
Write 276
Mixed 363
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 20.5
114% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 70.6
114% 223 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 103
Write 119
Mixed 120
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.76
119% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 75%
WD Authorized HDD 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1026
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 33.3
Mixed 32.3
42% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.21
88% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-8GRR 04CD F4-2133C15-8GRR Kingston KHX2133C14/16G 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74.8% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X170-Extreme ECC Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X170-Extreme ECC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback