Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3 Ultra-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z170X-UD3 Ultra
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3 Ultra-CF  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160624
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 12:53
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 225
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 632
61% 504 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 238
Reflection 215
Parallax 112
194% 188 fps
MRender 250
Gravity 160
Splatting 130
141% 180 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 161%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 439
Mixed 296
88% 397 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 39.2
162% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 293
238% 338 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
19GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,341
Write 1,977
Mixed 1532
433% 1950 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 70.8
250% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,346
DQ Write 1,059
DQ Mixed 1,117
859% 1,174 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43EB1-CPB M378A1G43EB1-CPB M378A2K43EB1-CWE 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170X-UD3 Ultra-CF Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD3 Ultra-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback