Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E1-572

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-572  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HW
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 08:38
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4010U-$280
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Memory 32
1-Core 14.8
2-Core 28.9
17% 25.2 Pts
4-Core 41.1
8-Core 43
6% 42 Pts
64-Core 46.1
3% 46.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0775) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4703
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.4
0% 0.83 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBOA6C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 22 8.1 39 39 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 63.1
Write 28
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 29.1
26% 35.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20.2% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 8
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 6.7
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 243
16% 243 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-572 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback