Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20BFA0WFAT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20BFA0WFAT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BFA0WFAT
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime30.7 Days
Run DateDec 23 '21 at 10:38
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 179
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 270
36% 268 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2210) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 7.2
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.4
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT05L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 103 122 127 106 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 403
Write 136
Mixed 146
SusWrite 116
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 23.9
97% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 134
DQ Mixed 59.8
94% 185 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 79%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB
464GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 118 120 119 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 106
Write 113
Mixed 33
SusWrite 120
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 Kingston 9905428-417.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20BFA0WFAT Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20BFA0WFAT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback