Gigabyte GA-C621 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-C621 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory185.3 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '21 at 17:56
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3175X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 72
1-Core 119
2-Core 230
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 890
78% 662 Pts
64-Core 4,420
274% 4,420 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Lighting 250
Reflection 183
Parallax 175
204% 203 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 160
Splatting 125
113% 139 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 158%
Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 441 416 415 417 410 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 440
Mixed 369
SusWrite 424
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 45.6
162% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 351
263% 351 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965640-035.C00G 6x31.8GB
6 of 12 slots used
191GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 27.8
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 8.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-C621 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-C621 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback