Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80K4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80K4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo ideapad 5
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '21 at 17:52
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-8700P Radeon R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 34.7
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 76.5
30% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 113
8-Core 115
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Legend(17AA 380A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 3.7
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
846GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 68 74 69 67 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 70.4
Write 75.5
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 70.5
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 229
18% 229 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80K4 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback