HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Laptop 15-bw0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8333
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191203
Uptime	8.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '21 at 12:47
Run Duration	489 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR) 17,422 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 37.1 1-Core 53.9 2-Core 75.2 33% 55.4 Pts	4-Core 117 8-Core 120 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 155 10% 155 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 8333) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.08.01 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	6.02% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 10 Parallax 11.9 6% 9.7 fps	MRender 6.9 Gravity 8.6 Splatting 7.6 6% 7.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.02% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GB 5,596 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 145GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV21H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 229 244 244 238 228 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 378 Write 258 Mixed 326 SusWrite 253 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 36.1 118% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 138 105% 141 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 115%
WDC WD25 00BEVS-22UST0 250GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 226GB free, PID 1351 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 23.4 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 19 29% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 13%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 29GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 25.8 Write 14.3 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 13.6 23% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.4 103% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 12GB 4,021 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 11.2 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 7.6 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 216 18% 216 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Laptop 15-bw0xx Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-bw0xx

CPU
A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 28%, 14,746 samples	259x
A6-9220 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 29%, 4,762 samples	155x
A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 35%, 17,422 samples	102x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	251x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	155x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	97x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	22x
SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 2,836 samples	16x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	63x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 13,712 samples	49x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16