Today's hottest deals

HP Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81EE
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170120
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJan 25 '22 at 03:40
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 182
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 292
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 81EE) 1GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 7.1
6% 6.53 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.7
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 119 101 84 80 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62% Good
Read 349
Write 332
Mixed 314
SusWrite 124
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 20.9
81% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 348
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.9
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 8,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback