ADD TO PC
BUILD

Aselsan SERVER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Aselsan SERVER (all builds)
Motherboard	ASELSAN ASELSAN SERVER
Memory	61 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '21 at 13:44
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5218T 5 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 68.4 1-Core 30.2 2-Core 61 37% 53.2 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 217 20% 167 Pts	64-Core 2,419 150% 2,419 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M.2 (S60) 3ME3 512GB 458GB free Firmware: S17411 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 108 115 112 113 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.5% Poor	Read 79.1 Write 112 Mixed 91.1 SusWrite 109 22% 98 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 36.6 4K Mixed 5.8 47% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 29.7 DQ Write 70.5 DQ Mixed 21.9 25% 40.7 MB/s

2.5" SATA SSD 3MG2-P 248GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: M150821 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 119 127 121 120 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.9% Average	Read 134 Write 127 Mixed 125 SusWrite 119 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 29.4 99% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 99.4 DQ Write 98.1 DQ Mixed 93.4 72% 97 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36ASF8G72PZ-2G9E1 1x31GB 1 of 24 slots used 31GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 6.1 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback