HP 700-567nz

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 700-567nz  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B36
Memory21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 02:39
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 195
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 530
58% 457 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Lighting 46
Reflection 47
Parallax 42.2
38% 45.1 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 37.1
32% 39 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 290 295 297 295 293 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 424
Mixed 412
SusWrite 294
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 47.3
162% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
460GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 132 132 132 133 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74% Very good
Read 129
Write 126
Mixed 62
SusWrite 130
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C11 Adata 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C11 Adata 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700-567nz Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP 700-567nz

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback