MSI MS-16F3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMicro-Star GT60
MotherboardMSI MS-16F3  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '17 at 06:48
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 93.6
2-Core 181
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 445
45% 363 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
MSI(1462 10EA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 2.91
4% 9.5 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.04
5% 5.31 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 253GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N111 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
91.7% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 442
Mixed 482
107% 479 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 30.8
102% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 69.5
111% 210 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
32.5% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 10.4
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16F3 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16F3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback