Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-10855M 1,078 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 71.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 220 74% 134 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 762 72% 597 Pts	64-Core 960 59% 960 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 22B8) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	4.08% Terrible	Lighting 6.1 Reflection 73.4 Parallax 9.8 5% 29.8 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 1 2% 3.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.08% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg6aznv1t02 TOSHIBA 1TB 1,507 User benchmarks, average bench 229% 801GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5108AGLA SusWrite @10s intervals: 1583 1409 1354 1182 1556 1604 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	239% Outstanding	Read 1,085 Write 1,041 Mixed 937 SusWrite 1,448 255% 1,128 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 67.5 226% 80.1 MB/s	DQ Read 944 DQ Write 702 DQ Mixed 826 617% 824 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 239% Great: 300%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 95GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 32767, 16384, 32767, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.4% Good	MC Read 22.9 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 21.1 67% 23.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 23.1 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 69%

Battle cruiser

CPU
Xeon W-10855MIntelBench 81%, 1,078 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 87%, 351 samples	9x
UHD Graphics P630IntelBench 5%, 1,032 samples	4x

SSD
TOSHIBA 1TBKxg6aznv1t02Bench 229%, 1,507 samples	8x
SKHynix_HFS001TD9TNI-L2B0B 1TBBench 243%, 1,272 samples	3x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	4x
TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 95GBUnknownBench 67%, 3 samples	3x
HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN 2x16GBHynixBench 91%, 1,276 samples	2x