Today's hottest deals

Asus UN65U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAsus UN65U  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UN65U
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 21:20
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 183
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 267
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8744) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 6.9
5% 5.53 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 195 211 216 211 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 371
Write 248
Mixed 209
SusWrite 211
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 18.2
107% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 129
130% 208 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$36
646GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 58 58 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 96.4
Write 93.5
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 55.9
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UN65U Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UN65U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback